← Markets
LA Mayoral Election: Court Rules 1st Round Fraudulent?

LA Mayoral Election: Court Rules 1st Round Fraudulent?

No end date·$65 24h vol·politics
$65 total volume

LA Mayoral Election: Court Rules 1st Round Fraudulent?

11%-35.0%
OutcomeYesNo
LA Mayoral Election: Court Rules 1st Round Fraudulent?

Order Book

LA Mayoral Election: Court Rules 1st Round Fraudulent?

PriceSharesTotal
21.0¢500$105
20.0¢600$120
19.0¢500$95
18.0¢400$72
17.0¢200$34
16.0¢100$16
15.0¢120$18
14.0¢3.3k$460
13.0¢40$5
12.0¢10$1
8.0¢last trade
4.0¢ spread
8.0¢530$42
7.0¢384$27
5.0¢2.4k$118
4.0¢2.2k$89
3.0¢3.3k$100
2.0¢8.6k$171
1.0¢6.2k$62
$609 bids$927 asks

Resolution Criteria

This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court. Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count. A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election. Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count. The primary resolution source will be official information from the relevant court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

LA Mayoral Election: Court Rules 1st Round Fraudulent?

10%